| Welcome to The Briercliffe Society Forum http://www.briercliffesociety.co.uk/talkback/ |
|
| Married and Deserted - 1892 http://www.briercliffesociety.co.uk/talkback/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=2331 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Mel [ Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Married and Deserted - 1892 |
The Northern Echo Tuesday August 2 1892 Married and Deserted Vincent Coates, a young miner, was charged at Bishop Auckland on Monday with deserting his wife, who wanted a separation. They lived in Monkhouse Cottages. -Margt. Cook said it was fearful to hear complainants shouts. She heard defendant utter threats when going to Roughlee. -Sergt. Sharp corroborated. The woman's stae showed ill-usage. -Defendant wanted his wife to join him; but complainant, much distressed, said she dared not; and an order for 7s 6d per week was made by the Bench. |
|
| Author: | Mel [ Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Married and Deserted - 1892 |
Is there another Roughlee or will this article be referring to the Roughlee in Lancashire? |
|
| Author: | Burnleymasher [ Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Married and Deserted - 1892 |
Bishop Auckland is in Durham as you probably know Mel, but I think there is only one Roughlee and that is in Lancashire. Stephanie. |
|
| Author: | charon10 [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Married and Deserted - 1892 |
If you Google for Rough Lee Durham, there are references to a Rough Lee (or Roughlee) near Bishop Auckland. Charon |
|
| Author: | Mel [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Married and Deserted - 1892 |
Thanks. Probably not our Roughlee then. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|