|
Here are the full details of entry no 135 in the booklet for Abraham LEAVER, at 'Extwhistle hall'. He is on 'Dole', not meaning unemployed, but that having no 'private' work he was employed by the township, probably on road work. For this he received 12/- a week (there was a scale according to family size). Ages of the household members were 42,34,14,13,11,9,7, and indeed they had 3 beds. The 'needs' comment is 'has fustian to make into a jacket for 11 (year-old) but cant get it made up - 14 clogs (meaning that the 14 year-old needs clogs).
Two other families with the same address :
No 136 William WHITEHEAD, a delver (quarryman), 5 in family, no further detail.
No 137 Sarah HOWE, a weaver working for J. HALSTEAD, 4 in family. Ages 26 (earning 2/- a week), 9,8,4 and a half. 'A widow 22 weeks, her father assists her'.
The others at the Hall were presumably not needy.
The document is one of a whole series kept by Ann Ecroyd, a leading Quaker, and in the Farrer collection at Manchester Local Studies Library (if that is the name these days !). Another notebook gives some detail of actual disbursements made.
I obtained a copy of the document above some years ago, initially for family history, and have done look-ups from time to time, for instance it has been 'advertised' by the Lancs FHS. I'm happy to continue to do that, but it can take a little time : the document covers Cop Row, Briercliffe+Extwistle, and Great Marsden. Only needy families were covered, but that was I think about two thirds of the population at this dire time (Feb 1843).
For background see Roger Frost's book. Also in 1995 I had an article published in the journal Local Population Studies (Autumn issue), an analysis of its economic information basically [If that all sounds grand, let me emphasise I'm a mathematician not a historian or ecenomist ! Contributors to LPS are mainly enthusiastic amateurs with interests in aspects of local history]. If you read the article, beware of one major editorial error, and one minor !
I did have discussion by post/e-mail a bit back with Roger Frost and John Bentley about maybe getting the document published, with some supporting background material, possible as as Society Project, and I think they were quite keen.
Rex
|